本帖最後由 kenn 於 2013-2-5 12:41 編輯
前天(2/2)賣了Intel330-120換入M5Pro-Xtreme. 曾進行了小小測試, 現比較兩者之效能.
(A) CrystalDiskMark 3.0.2 x64
M5Pro
M5Pro-Xtreme
M5Pro
M5Pro-Xtreme
M5Pro
M5Pro-Xtreme
(B) AS SSD Benchmark
M5Pro
M5Pro-Xtreme
M5Pro
M5Pro-Xtreme
(C) ATTO Disk Benchmark
M5Pro
M5Pro-Xtreme
(D) HD Tune
M5Pro
M5Pro-Xtreme
M5Pro
M5Pro-Xtreme
結論:
CDM Test: M5Pro-Xtreme read 祗多了1%, 但4K read 慢了11% (37 ->33MB/s).
AS SSD Benchmark: 4K read/write皆慢了. Read由34MB/s跌速到30MB/s. Write由91MB/s跌到78MB/s. 但4K-64Thrd write 則由206MB/s升為286MB/s. IOPS則4K-64 read/write皆快了 --- 但未到100,000, read最高袛是93,059 iops, write為73,371 iops).
但512B則了一個double(16,715 iops -->31,750 iops).
ATTO Disk Benchmark: 兩者皆差不多.
HD Tune: M5Pro-Xtreme burst rate 由376MB/s升為390MB/s. Average也升至395MB/s. Random seek 由21290 IOPS 升至43078 IOPS. Random seek 4KB 及Butterfly seek 也升了.
相對M5Pro而言, M5Pro-Xtreme並無帶來驚喜, 表現中等而已. 但整體上相對其他品牌SSD, 我仍會選它(因有5年保).
我電腦主要用於photo editing, 所以要快.
(利申: 我用過之SSD有OCZ-60, Intel X25M-80, Intel 330-120, Crucial M4-128, Plextor M3-256, M5Pro-256, 及M5Pro-Xtreme-256. ) |