binbinbin123

我 ge 經驗話比我聽，唔想煩就唔好玩 SW Raid，就算只係 0 同 1 都係

ftpser

回復 10# 文文仔

On board RAID 0: OK, you can feel the different, but high risk on data lost
On board RAID 5: Many user, including me, got only ~15MB/s write speed on Intel board, so not recommended.

Hardware Raid 0: a little bit faster then On board Raid 0, extra RAID card cost.
Hardware Raid 5: Well...you can buy an SSD with this price and SSD will be a lot faster.

文文仔

回復 11# binbinbin123


    好的,唔該你

文文仔

回復 12# ftpser


    唔該晒師兄

文文仔

睇黎都係乖乖地等SSD平算-,-"
窮人都係要慢._.

ftpser

回復 15# 文文仔

How much budget you got? and size required?

I don't have HW raid but after reading some posts it would cost you at least $3k~
If you have <$2k, SSD ba

22over7

我都玩過Raid0
load game 係快D
不過好快死了.....
其實...你玩得HW Raid + 3隻 Harddisk
我諗都可以買到SSD/....
( HW Raid card  ~$4xx  + $200x3   ~=  $1000)

22over7

朋友你都幾得意,噤我盡力解答你問題啦
我呢家行緊raid0太約有兩年啦,無問題出現過,我係無過raid5既, ...
dirtyman1984 發表於 2011-4-30 02:30

朋友...平心靜氣咁講下啦
其實Raid0 死亡機會率係幾高下
一只死就會死set Raid0死
用Raid0 ....只不過真係為效能
當然你用咩Harddisk 都係一個好大既因數
當然...你唔怕既 真係無問題
我相信如果你對你組Raid 內的資產  比較  重視的話
你會
1. 日日 back up
2. 行Raid5/6/10/01
3.行Raid5/6/10/01 + back up

barton

如果你為o左快o既,行SSD效果比raid 0明顯,
行sw raid 0 比單行一隻快30%~50% 左右la,容量上多1倍;不過出事風險高o左1倍,用電量亦多o左1倍

行raid 0 o既話, Hw同sw分別唔太大, 用得hwo黎raid 0 好似有o的大材小用咁..除非真係好計較果少少lo...