~飛兒~

原帖由 buoku 於 2010-1-8 18:40 發表

There is no use to say it in the forum.
You bring the recording to the court and see who will get into trouble.
The one who record it secretly or the reporter.

the reporter and the interviewee both have a copy of the recording
are they both getting themselves into trouble?

[ 本帖最後由 ~飛兒~ 於 2010-1-8 18:43 編輯 ]

John Lam

原帖由 linomu 於 2010-1-8 18:28 發表


律師信比人唔等如上Court,OK! 有好多SEND左幾封律師信就無下文
第二我只想講有更好方式交代,唔需要用清者自清方式
eg 唔駛錢有去記協投訴壹仔, 記協係有D POWER!
直接去壹仔投訴,我有買開壹仔,久唔久都有道歉聲明la, 肥佬黎都唔同你打官司燒錢la,你當佢蠢!

咁你要計好多野ka...高院的費用但按照他們的計算，HKEPC及我自身的Branding是多少錢?
無所有ka...有排打，仲要一定會上訴~

~飛兒~

原帖由 buoku 於 2010-1-8 18:39 發表

The fact is, JL may have already violated the law there.

the fact is, you are not replying what you have quoted

anyway, whether he's illegal to record in USA or not is not important, unless you are the one who want to charge him

[ 本帖最後由 ~飛兒~ 於 2010-1-8 18:46 編輯 ]

kamcm

我讀過幾年法律...拿左 LE title...

就我所知... 打WIN 官司果方大約都要比4成訟費...因為唔係所有$$$都claim 得番
而打輸果方就係100%己方+ 支付WIN 果方果6成...

所以除左律師... 邊個都係輸家....

[ 本帖最後由 kamcm 於 2010-1-8 18:45 編輯 ]

~飛兒~

原帖由 kamcm 於 2010-1-8 18:44 發表
我讀過幾年法律...拿左 LE title...

就我所知... 打WIN 官司果方大約都要比4成訟費...因為唔係所有$$$都claim 得番
而打輸果方就係100%己方+ 支付WIN 果方果6成...

所以除左律師... 邊個都係輸家....

所以好睇賠償 cover 唔 cover 到個訟費....

~飛兒~

原帖由 buoku 於 2010-1-8 18:47 發表

Talking about the follow-up telecon that JL claim he recorded from the USA.

Anyway, it's not up to you to judge but if someone report and bring it to the court, then you'll see who will be in ...

again, does he have to present the telephone recordings to the court
those three recordings does not represent anything about the unprofessional report from Next

and ya, unless you are the one, else who will be in trouble?

[ 本帖最後由 ~飛兒~ 於 2010-1-8 18:51 編輯 ]

John Lam

原帖由 buoku 於 2010-1-8 18:30 發表

Pal, Las Vegas is in Nevada.

If the recording itself is illegal in the first place, it may not be accepted in the court.
Courts in HK has rejected some ICAC recordings that were recorded illegally.
...

我在美國是用另一支手機的，他打我香港手機，HTC Touch Pro支援VOIP Forward把這個對話用Internet傳送，但錄音的手機仍在香港，我是用軟件聽電話，錄的Process在香港，和US政府無關。

John Lam

原帖由 buoku 於 2010-1-8 18:47 發表

Talking about the follow-up telecon that JL claim he recorded from the USA.

Anyway, it's not up to you to judge but if someone report and bring it to the court, then you'll see who will be in ...

VOIP現在很流行，去找找XDA-Development很多人在研發，所以點解個錄音成日都話聽唔到，因為Delay好嚴重

kamcm

原帖由 ~飛兒~ 於 2010-1-8 18:45 發表


所以好睇賠償 cover 唔 cover 到個訟費....

defamation 所造成的實質損失係好難proof 同計算...