wyman0210

原帖由 不OC的OC•illso 於 2009-4-20 15:51 發表

there is a same case in car industry.
A car call CEO which made by a chinese manufactory, it copied the design from BMW X5. BMW tried to accuse that factory but they failed. But is that means that ca ...

呢件野同m8有咩關係
m8又唔係copy   iphone
m8同iphone  係邊個設計先都冇人知
當然牌子會令好多人追求 , 從而達到抄人變為原創

[ 本帖最後由 wyman0210 於 2009-4-20 16:04 編輯 ]

c2600264

我用緊m8,我覺得有d地方比iphone強,如果係抄,點解會好d既,唔係一樣既咩?

不OC的OC•illso

原帖由 wyman0210 於 2009-4-20 16:00 發表


唔係咁講既
佢地認為大牌子就算抄都無所謂   spec強就ok
但係佢地又會針對d 小牌子  抄人

原因就係佢地認為咁大間公司洗咩抄人     其實好多野都係抄返黎  
你地呢d 公 ...

why there are only 2 types

不OC的OC•illso

原帖由 wyman0210 於 2009-4-20 16:04 發表


呢件野同m8有咩關係
m8又唔係copy   iphone
m8同iphone  係邊個設計先都冇人知
當然牌子會令好多人追求 , 從而達到抄人變為原創

then you can say CEO is not copying X5 too

[ 本帖最後由 不OC的OC•illso 於 2009-4-20 16:20 編輯 ]

不OC的OC•illso

原帖由 c2600264 於 2009-4-20 16:07 發表
我用緊m8,我覺得有d地方比iphone強,如果係抄,點解會好d既,唔係一樣既咩?

copy is not = the same wor

c2600264

原帖由 不OC的OC•illso 於 2009-4-20 16:09 發表

copy is not = the same wor

明白!!!

wyman0210

原帖由 不OC的OC•illso 於 2009-4-20 16:09 發表

then you can CEO is not copying X5 too

then you can CEO is not copying X5 too   
我英文好差  唔明
then you can CEO點解???

但係你講ceo  copy  x5喎   你都講明copy  仲要問人係唔係copy

不OC的OC•illso

原帖由 wyman0210 於 2009-4-20 16:16 發表


then you can CEO is not copying X5 too   
我英文好差  唔明
then you can CEO點解???

但係你講ceo  copy  x5喎   你都講明copy  仲要問人係唔係copy

Sorry, Missed 1 word...
Everyone can have their own judgement

不OC的OC•illso

原帖由 c2600264 於 2009-4-20 16:14 發表

明白!!!

Maybe better to say, Copy is not = totally the same that's my fault

kyle1358

事實啊!!
係價值觀問題!!!