Mtube

兩位既然見識不淺, 又何不容人以量?
打個比喻: 人係唔係動物先? 但亦都有人話人唔係動物
話人係動物係站於生物學角度
話人唔係動物係基於道德價值

呢個問題唔係三言兩語就可以得出結論, 如果覺得對方錯就由得對方繼續錯吧

insanity

From GNU FAQ:

Why do you call it GNU/Linux and not Linux? (#why)
Most operating system distributions based on Linux as kernel are basically modified versions of the GNU operating system. We began developing GNU in 1984, years before Linus Torvalds started to write his kernel. Our goal was to develop a complete free operating system. Of course, we did not develop all the parts ourselves—but we led the way. We developed most of the central components, forming the largest single contribution to the whole system. The basic vision was ours too.

insanity

Again from GNU FAQ

How did it come about that most people call the system “Linux”? (#howerror)
Calling the system “Linux” is a confusion that has spread faster than the corrective information.

The people who combined Linux with the GNU system were not aware that that's what their activity amounted to. They focused their attention on the piece that was Linux and did not realize that more of the combination was GNU. They started calling it “Linux” even though that name did not fit what they had. It took a few years for us to realize what a problem this was and ask people to correct the practice. By that time, the confusion had a big head start.

Most of the people who call the system “Linux” have never heard why that's not the right thing. They saw others using that name and assume it must be right. The name “Linux” also spreads a false picture of the system's origin, because people tend to suppose that the system's history was such as to fit that name. For instance, they often believe its development was started by Linus Torvalds in 1991. This false picture tends to reinforce the idea that the system should be called “Linux”.

Many of the questions in this file represent people's attempts to justify the name they are accustomed to using.

archy

兩位既然見識不淺, 又何不容人以量?
打個比喻: 人係唔係動物先? 但亦都有人話人唔係動物
話人係動物係站於 ...
Mtube 發表於 2013-9-12 10:36

做人有容人之量係應該
不同立場也沒有什麼關係
討論區建立目的也是為了討論

但硬係要用自己立場去套牢其他人
唔認同就要求要人切 J 呢 d 言論就不能接受

況且，睇哂上文下理，沒有任何參與討論者
認同那套獨特說法。

只要觀點不一樣就要認定所有人都是錯的，
這個是人格上面的一種嚴重缺陷！

erickleung

回復 33# lazyfai

我是用chromebook pixel, 上次Google I/O的贈品, 從Amazon訂回來, 不用9K, 又有免費1TB Google Drive用3年的.  比正價平一半. 補償了不能用4G上網的遺憾, 那是因為那US機, US Carrier把modem上了鎖, 裝回香港sim card是不能用的.

超高解像度, 勁正, 現用來看video較多.  但缺點是當用ubuntu時, 所有畫面變得太少, 較少用linux工作了.

lazyfai

果然係 Chromebook pixel, 不過其實 Chromium OS 同 Chromebook 裡面嘅 ChromeOS 差好遠㗎...

回復  lazyfai

我是用chromebook pixel, 上次Google I/O的贈品, 從Amazon訂回來, 不用9K, 又有免費1TB Go ...
erickleung 發表於 2013-9-12 13:17

erickleung

回復 47# lazyfai

我是用下面的程序做
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOoCxrn5M9Y

因為現在可以offline edit Office Document with my chromebook pixel, 暫時無必要用linux, 現時轉回Beta 版的ChromeOS, 可以幾秒開機或關機, 不用要等1分鐘的Developer mode. 開機不入BIOS確是很快

cdromguy

做人有容人之量係應該
不同立場也沒有什麼關係
討論區建立目的也是為了討論

但硬係要用自己立場去套牢 ...
archy 發表於 2013-9-12 13:03

大凡做學問, 講定義，有狹義、有廣義、有主流，亦有派別。

只懂顧狹義，或是談廣義，都是不求甚解，所以没說錯你。你就是不明白，鑽了牛角尖。頭腦欠精明，又不落苦功，怎去做學問？如斯做學問，一定無前途，回應窩囊廢，我真沒興致。

本來不應說，無奈見君可憐相，唯有相告之，望君早回頭，莫亂佔人家嘴頭便宜。

cdromguy

回復 41# Mtube


小朋友發脾氣都是想大人注意，你唔理佢，講兩講佢係醒目仔的話見唔夠人講就會收皮。你睇番某某既post，某某好似成日自己對號入座，都未搞清楚subject、object，佢可能覺得自己很失敗，於是就以為人家自認成功，又成日將人家的疑問句看成陳述句。譬如，我問某某如果係distrowatch上揾唔到chromium OS可否切J，佢就理解成我認為不能在distrowatch上找到的就不是linux。無疑，要教有閱讀障礙的人是好辛苦。

而且，一路上對他人不斷作出人身攻擊的只是某某，我是没某某好氣，也對某某提不起興趣。

以前，我會諗唔係主修哲學的人點解咁鍾意去讀哲學系的邏輯基礎班，後來才知道世界有些人是十分需要的。