samiux

原帖由 snoopy11hk 於 2008-12-25 14:41 發表

PS for linux plz
MS office for linux plz
MS MSN for linux plz

PS? Photoshop?  Gimp is.
MS Office? OpenOffice, StarOffice, KOffice and Sympthony are.
MS MSN?  Pidgin, aMSN and etc.

However, it is not saying Linux's should be 100% compatible with Windows.  They are different Operating System.  Be keep in mind.  

foobar

原帖由 snoopy11hk 於 2008-12-25 14:41 發表

PS for linux plz
MS office for linux plz
MS MSN for linux plz

Photoshop for linux 機會唔係冇, 曾幾何時真係出過 Photoshop for SunOS (Photoshop 3.0 年代應該未叫 Solaris), 而且到今時今日 Creative Suite 都仲有 Windows 同 OS X 版, 我諗佢 D Code 至少都有預 cross OS, 只要 Adobe 覺得有利可圖 (即係 Linux 個 Market 夠大), 佢地絕對地有可能出 Creative Suite for Linux

至於 Microsoft o野嘛, 你話呢?

foobar

原帖由 samiux 於 2008-12-25 14:47 發表


PS? Photoshop?  Gimp is.
MS Office? OpenOffice, StarOffice, KOffice and Sympthony are.
MS MSN?  Pidgin, aMSN and etc.

However, it is not saying Linux's should be 100% compatible with Windows.  They ...

唔係人人接受 Alternatives 架, 唔就手就係唔就手, 某程度上就好似有一部現成 Windows IIS o既 Server 要 Admin 一樣, 大家都係 Web Server, 但有得俾我揀我真係寧願用 Linux + Apache

samiux

原帖由 foobar 於 2008-12-25 15:04 發表


唔係人人接受 Alternatives 架, 唔就手就係唔就手, 某程度上就好似有一部現成 Windows IIS o既 Server 要 Admin 一樣, 大家都係 Web Server, 但有得俾我揀我真係寧願用 Linux + Apache

If you are using Linux, you may use Linux softwares no matter it is alternative to Windows' or not.  Linux is Linux.  Windows is Windows.  Why Windows users always mixed them up?

In my opinion, Linux SHOULD NOT be 100% compatible with Windows.  But she should compatible with Windows in some degree in general.

valleybok

原帖由 foobar 於 2008-12-25 14:21 發表


Sorry 問 D 低能問題, 因為我真係未用過 OpenSuSE

XFS 係指 X Font Server 定 XFS Filesystem?

XFS Filesystem,SUSE開機直接支援不需另間/boot做ext3

[ 本帖最後由 valleybok 於 2008-12-25 16:10 編輯 ]

valleybok

原帖由 snoopy11hk 於 2008-12-25 14:41 發表

PS for linux plz
MS office for linux plz
MS MSN for linux plz

XGL for windows plz
XMB for windows plz
XFS for windows plz

windows的使用者不用勉強來,
我的目標不是要打造一個WINDOWS
而是打造一個更優WINDOWS的桌面系統

[ 本帖最後由 valleybok 於 2008-12-25 16:13 編輯 ]

valleybok

原帖由 foobar 於 2008-12-25 15:04 發表


唔係人人接受 Alternatives 架, 唔就手就係唔就手, 某程度上就好似有一部現成 Windows IIS o既 Server 要 Admin 一樣, 大家都係 Web Server, 但有得俾我揀我真係寧願用 Linux + Apache

APPLE一樣跟WINDOWS係樣樣都唔同...但有樣野唔同就係~佢桌面比WINDOWS更就手..所以佢掂左~

[ 本帖最後由 valleybok 於 2008-12-25 16:15 編輯 ]

valleybok

原帖由 samiux 於 2008-12-25 14:42 發表


Debian has a similar tools a Yast namely Apt and it also have GUI and text mode as Yast.

其實我都有諗過用Debian做系統原型,但...在設計上要發很大功夫才能達到SUSE所開發的效果

foobar

原帖由 samiux 於 2008-12-25 15:38 發表

In my opinion, Linux SHOULD NOT be 100% compatible with Windows.  But she should compatible with Windows in some degree in general.

我唔係話兩者要 compatible, 只係想講出有時 alternatives 未必滿足到其他人o既習慣或需要。 只要 Linux 個 market share 係夠 significant, commercial software 絕對有機會 (MS o個 D 就難講 D) port 過黎 Linux 黎滿足大家, 而唔係話一定要人地用 alternatives 咁o者

foobar

原帖由 valleybok 於 2008-12-25 16:08 發表

XFS Filesystem,SUSE開機直接支援不需另間/boot做ext3

明白... 依家呢一代o既 Linux 基本上都 support 用唔同類型o既 root filesystem 直接 boot 架? 我依家用緊呢部 Ubuntu 個 root 係 jfs, 我以前都用過 md software raid1 行 reiserfs 做 Debian 個 root, 兩部都係因為懶所以一個 partition 行晒, 冇獨立 boot partition

獨立 boot partition so far 只係個 root o係 LVM / software raid5 入面時先至係必要 (因為個 kernel file 有機會分散o係超過一隻 Hard Disk)? 否則我見依家 D distribution (除o左 Debian 同 Ubuntu 我仲有用過 CentOS) 都係用 initrd, 冇獨立 boot partition 其實都冇問題