回覆 80# redcarcar

但外資品牌在國內要與國內品牌合資生產及銷售, 內銷與外銷出口質量有一定差異. 大多香港外資品牌, 個別型號均在歐洲生產, 除吉利旗下子品牌有機會在國內生產外, 以香港國內品牌為例, 如BYD/Aion/MG 等, 車的內籠配套/車輪配置/車的防撞跟歐洲EURO NCAP等與國內同款型號有些微差別.

TOP

You are a strange man/woman, murderfreaker  
I already told you I do not care about getting my ...
PPLd 發表於 2026-4-7 07:25


講到尾,係你自己唔裝
唔係人地EV本質問題。


所以你個Conclusion同打咁大段嘢,都仲係廢話。

TOP

They are both driving at 110km/h, same road same day same time (except charging station vs ga ...
PPLd 發表於 2026-4-3 13:56


  This is just Mathematics. If both goes on same speed, the difference will only be refueling / charging time.   Given you are saying 5 minutes in gas station and only one refuel, I assume the refuel of Camry takes only 5 mintues.  You wrote the time required for Tesla is 9 minutes more than Camry, so the total charging time of 2 charges is only 5+9 = 14 minutes?  Am I correct?   It is really doubtful.  

Furthermore, there is one point that I think everyone misses.  I believe when the test begins, both cars are with a full tank / fully charged.  It would be fairer to refuel / recharge fully at the end of journey with the refuel / recharge time added.  

BTW, there is no link provided in your post for the video.

TOP

本帖最後由 PPLd 於 2026-4-9 14:28 編輯
講到尾,係你自己唔裝
唔係人地EV本質問題。


所以你個Conclusion同打咁大段嘢,都仲係廢話。 ...
murderfreaker 發表於 2026-4-8 13:45



    You are lucky enough to have your own charger.
But in HK most people care about outside paid charging.
In fact 85.7% EV owners [2024] do not have access to their private charging at home.
For these 85.7% people, road side charging is a few minutes slower than fueling for every 1000km driven.
If you drive 10000km in one year, the gap is expected to be bigger.

Edit:
On the other hand, if you are the lucky 8.8% or 14.3%, then EV would skip the trip gas station and actually save money and time.

TOP

This is just Mathematics. If both goes on same speed, the difference will only be refueling / ch ...
chpyeung 發表於 2026-4-8 15:59



    If my memory serve me right, the charging time was around 15 minutes.  The charging was planned by Tesla trip computer.  They only used Superchargers during this test.  The fueling was unplanned.
So the main source of difference is probably "route to fuel station" vs "route to charging station".

TOP

You are lucky enough to have your own charger.
But in HK most people care about outside paid  ...
PPLd 發表於 2026-4-8 18:39

如果你拎澳洲做例子,個比例就唔會得咁少啦。

同埋充電站同停車位係有整合性,特別係啲商場,呢啲都係油站俾唔到。

TOP

如果你拎澳洲做例子,個比例就唔會得咁少啦。

同埋充電站同停車位係有整合性,特別係啲商場,呢啲都係油 ...
murderfreaker 發表於 2026-4-11 12:03


It is actually a good idea for HK Journalist to test how much time difference there would be.
But I cant find one yet.
Do you have source?

TOP

新款電動版C Class一樣採用800V新架構,800V平台基本上已正式成為標準。

https://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=303&t=7253396
C 400 4MATIC electric,最大輸出達489ps,0~100km/h加速僅需 4.0 秒,WLTP續航里程最高來到762公里。電池則搭載一組可用容量為94kWh的鋰電池,並支援800V高壓架構。在理想條件下,僅需10分鐘即可補充約325公里續航,DC快充功率最高則可達330kW,不過原廠已表示會再推出一輛後驅單馬達車型,預估其WLTP續航里程將會上看800公里!

TOP

新款電動版C Class一樣採用800V新架構,800V平台基本上已正式成為標準。

https://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=303&t=7253396
C 400 4MATIC electric,最大輸出達489ps,0~100km/h加速僅需 4.0 秒,WLTP續航里程最高來到762公里。電池則搭載一組可用容量為94kWh的鋰電池,並支援800V高壓架構。在理想條件下,僅需10分鐘即可補充約325公里續航,DC快充功率最高則可達330kW,不過原廠已表示會再推出一輛後驅單馬達車型,預估其WLTP續航里程將會上看800公里!
billyyau 發表於 2026-4-21 10:16


重點來啦. 有幾大機會用到?

TOP

重點來啦. 有幾大機會用到?
chpyeung 發表於 2026-4-22 11:36


香港唔太凍,唔難做到
大功率充電站,有需就有求,BMW BENZ最好銷量車系都用上後,普及就一定會,到時就自然多商家投資配合的充電機。

TOP