pockchop

樓主, 其實金XX d人有無同你講呢部唔係全新機, 所以平少少比你咁?

administrator~

明知人地唔老實，自己就要小心D 啦

wilson409

咁PK既

marychan

平心而論我都覺大部份責任係你買家你身上
已經比你先試後買
另外其實高登幾乎9成鋪都係比得張"木台" 仔你試 ...
manlung803 發表於 2013-9-8 19:23

    冇錯,貨物出門,錢貨2清,可怪誰?

skies8246

下次真係要認真檢查清楚先好拎走,d sales 轉頭就唔認數

carsonhung

You really need to be careful, I bought 2 mon from this company, the second time, after check the color test and going to pack the mon back, I ASKED the sale to let me check the mon once again, and I find a scratch at the back of the mon, I pointed it out, then he tried to remove it by a cloth but unsuccessful.
Then I request a new one, he ask me wait 20mins as they need to get those new from warehouse, and ask me the walk around and come back.
I just stay at the shop and wait around 35mins , I need to refund. then they ask me wait a bit more and finally 2 to 3 new monitors arrive.

carsonhung

報警都冇用先CHECK後錢,樓主買芒真係唔可以太大意的
我自己買芒時一定慢慢CHECK , 唔會理左唔左佢地做生意
...
marco173 發表於 2013-9-8 19:15

   Me too, 一定慢慢CHECK , 唔會理左唔左佢地做生意

dd4567

好多時買野要檢查時賣果個都好鐘意笑住講一句:放心,我地7日有問題拎返來會換全新比你講真有幾多個到時件貨花左爛左少左零件會換比你唔黑臉阿

himson

純邏輯推論:
1.如果"花痕唔係自己做成",就剩底以下可能,
   a.出產時產品本身有問題或運送出現損壞
    b.零售店處理貨品時做成
如果你相信1."花痕唔係自己做成"既說法, 咁就算係樓主不夠仔細check,
回到家先發現問題, 再回去店舖理論., 有可不可? 你最多咪話換換到既可能性係好低,因為証據唔夠,
証明唔到係店方做成損壞. 但如果咁武斷就講到樓主係"攪事"或某些人說的,"鋪頭岩,你錯晒","樓主極度無賴", 咁就奇怪了. 因為道理上如果1. "花痕唔係自己做成" 就只剩a.跟b., 呢2樣要負責既係廠方,代理,零售而不是樓主. 咁其實你本身已經認為"係樓主整花"既. 如果係咁認為既, 唔該比d理據出來指出"花痕"係樓主做成. 或其實你認為樓主係講緊大話?