inzite

原帖由 cainester 於 2009-7-24 17:22 發表
Very nice indeed....the photos and the place....
It looks out of this world...
How high did you go?

i think highest point we were briefly at was 5300M, we also spent a nite at 52xxm at mount everest base camp.

inzite

原帖由 Moderator 於 2009-7-24 20:39 發表

先決條件係空氣要夠好

yes the longer the lens, the more air particles it picks up.

manman1998

兩貼D相都又青見又舒服

mklam

4月都打算去西藏, 但無TELE鏡, 本身用5D3, 諗緊入支70-200 II還是100-400 II好?各位師兄可否分享經驗. 謝.

inzite

4月都打算去西藏, 但無TELE鏡, 本身用5D3, 諗緊入支70-200 II還是100-400 II好?各位師兄可否分享經驗. 謝. ...
mklam 發表於 2015-2-5 11:48

70-200 should be sufficient, u can always add an extender to it as it heard it takes them quite well, 100-400 has smaller aperture which might be more restrictive.

rickee

但我覺得影風景大白好d，光圈大唔係太有優勢

mklam

其實我仲有部600D, 加支70-200應該都夠長影山峰果D, 多謝各位師兄.

doraemon123

想當年睇左呢輯相，去西藏既念頭先至萌生

mklam

請問有冇師兄知香港canon 70-200 2.8 IS ii賣幾次左右呢？因為我系澳門問要hkd16300，但我有港澳免費船飛，可以去香港買，見d人話16000內就有。

inzite

請問有冇師兄知香港canon 70-200 2.8 IS ii賣幾次左右呢？因為我系澳門問要hkd16300，但我有港澳免費船飛， ...
mklam 發表於 2015-2-6 23:29

just buy in macau through someone that knows the main store at friendship price.