nelsonlee130

咁多篇報導都無提過
Boeing/FAA係獅航空難後係有跟進
B737-MAX-AD-1107

內容可以自己睇

我覺得今次重點, 係埃航有無確實執行上述文件內容

nelsonlee130

大大 信不信 機師 都有 足夠的訓練? 包括 危急情況!
若 訓練 無教 MCAS 或 有資料被隱瞞, 錯不在機師!!!
A ...
toylet 發表於 2019-4-3 08:45 PM

都預左無人會認真睇份AD
我貼重點出黎

Required by AD 2018-23-51
Runaway Stabilizer
Disengage autopilot and control airplane pitch attitude with control column
and main electric trim as required. If relaxing the column causes the trim to
move, set stabilizer trim switches to CUTOUT. If runaway continues, hold
the stabilizer trim wheel against rotation and trim the airplane manually.
Note: The 737-8/-9 uses a Flight Control Computer command of pitch
trim to improve longitudinal handling characteristics. In the event of
erroneous Angle of Attack (AOA) input, the pitch trim system can trim
the stabilizer nose down in increments lasting up to 10 seconds.
In the event an uncommanded nose down stabilizer trim is experienced
on the 737-8/-9, in conjunction with one or more of the indications or
effects listed below, do the existing AFM Runaway Stabilizer
procedure above, ensuring that the STAB TRIM CUTOUT switches
are set to CUTOUT and stay in the CUTOUT position for the
remainder of the flight.
An erroneous AOA input can cause some or all of the following
indications and effects:
• Continuous or intermittent stick shaker on the affected side only.
• Minimum speed bar (red and black) on the affected side only.
• Increasing nose down control forces.
• IAS DISAGREE alert.
• ALT DISAGREE alert.
• AOA DISAGREE alert (if the option is installed).
• FEEL DIFF PRESS light.
• Autopilot may disengage.
• Inability to engage autopilot.
Initially, higher control forces may be needed to overcome any
stabilizer nose down trim already applied. Electric stabilizer trim can be
used to neutralize control column pitch forces before moving the STAB
TRIM CUTOUT switches to CUTOUT. Manual stabilizer trim can be
used before and after the STAB TRIM CUTOUT switches are moved
to CUTOUT.

其實"Runaway Stabilizer"就唔係MAX先會出現嘅問題
MCAS固然有缺憾 但我睇就比媒體用黎無限放大 引導觀眾
自己上youtube掘下, 關於"Runaway Stabilizer"嘅示範片段多不勝數

機師唔識應對先講唔通吧

我信唔信, 重要咩?
NTSB一查埃航機師訓練記錄, 真相就會大白
p.s.其實埃航一早打緊開口牌, 梗係啦, 查到not comply with AD 釘牌架

nelsonlee130

講得出not necessary只係顯得出你對成件事有幾偏頗, 英文叫bias
份AD由FAA發出, 航空公司人人有份, 而且列明
"Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done."
"Within 3 days after receipt of this AD, revise the Certificate Limitations chapter of the
applicable AFM to include the information in figure 1" (即係#34嘅內容)
即係航空公司收到後3日就要更新Airplane Flight Manual(AFM)
份AD就7 NOV 2018發出嘅, 埃航發生前3個月, 咁簡單嘅英文唔駛再elaborate掛?

小人的問題是訓練內容是否足夠.... 除非大大上過課否則很難估! 跟住 就是 考試 是否 嚴格了!
toylet 發表於 2019-4-3 10:19 PM

啱啊, 一般人無上過堂又點知"訓練是否足夠?"
所以我話"我信唔信, 重要咩?"
FAA, NTSB等政府機構知咪得囉
機師訓練記錄實有留低嘅
除非埃航毀屍滅跡者

大大 揸過 737 Max 8? 不是講 PC flight simulator!
toylet 發表於 2019-4-3 10:19 PM

你唔會想講, 揸過737 MAX先可以評論今次意外掛
敢問師兄你又揸過737 MAX? 見你MCAS AOA云云講到言之鑿鑿咁
新聞評論班記者肯定有737 MAX type cert. la 仲有出黎評論果班磚家

nelsonlee130

且看新聞, 下回分解!
toylet 發表於 2019-4-4 12:44 AM

真正結果起碼一年後NTSB出報告先知
好似13年Asiana 214 都要14年先有report summary
https://www.ntsb.gov/news/events ... a_BMG-abstract.aspx

但一年後仲有幾多媒體會繼續炒作
仲有幾多人會記得埃航
that's the question

ccc123

邊個夠胆撘。。。。。。