win150

原帖由 David Kirk 於 2009-6-4 18:17 發表


really?

唔好講甘遠
3870x2 vs 9800gx2
4870x2 vs 295
3870 vs 8800 / 9800
4890 vs 285

EPC 果然是A網, 版主甘公正評論, 可喜

win 晒?

ATI之前係咁delay,好難同期喎


[ 本帖最後由 win150 於 2009-6-4 18:38 編輯 ]

zaha

原帖由 David Kirk 於 2009-6-4 18:17 發表


really?

唔好講甘遠
3870x2 vs 9800gx2
4870x2 vs 295
3870 vs 8800 / 9800
4890 vs 285

EPC 果然是A網, 版主甘公正評論, 可喜

win 晒?

原帖由 logistica 於 2009-6-4 17:49 發表

Intel 5xx (?) mm^2 ~=NV 5xx mm^2 >=Ati 290 mm^2

你咁唔鐘意epc,身為N 卡打手留係pro a 的epc,
而且正身ban左仲要用分身上

win150

原帖由 s 於 2009-6-4 18:37 發表

That's how many benchmarks in which our 1GHz/1.2GHz (core/mem) Radeon HD 4890 lead the stock NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285. That's nothing to sneeze at. Certainly it doesn't mean that the 4890 is faster or  ...

你段野都有講,it does not mean 4890 is faster or better...
4890有咁既成績都係因為佢好超

[ 本帖最後由 win150 於 2009-6-4 18:53 編輯 ]

win150

原帖由 s 於 2009-6-4 18:54 發表

... show that there is the potential for a 959 Million transistor AMD GPU to consistently outperform a 1.4 Billion transistor NVIDIA GPU in the same power envelope at 55nm with similar memory bandwid ...

so that is just potential, normally potential is a waste, just like a human brain.
And how many transistor it has is not going to affect you, right ?

[ 本帖最後由 win150 於 2009-6-4 19:01 編輯 ]

G-核戰機

原帖由 David Kirk 於 2009-6-4 18:17 發表


really?

唔好講甘遠
3870x2 vs 9800gx2
4870x2 vs 295
3870 vs 8800 / 9800
4890 vs 285

EPC 果然是A網, 版主甘公正評論, 可喜

win 晒?

咁俾面!?

275 VS 4890才對
285貴左一級