作者: Botti 時間: 2017-8-8 08:38 標題: 其實佢有無牌 ?
Source : 東方日報
http://tv.on.cc/hk/index.html?i= ... -M&d=1502089492
其實佢有無車牌 ? 定新牌 ? 連油門 brake 都控制唔到
第一下唔識 dup 車, 架 Rover 車頭已大花痕
第二下重咁扭軑,,,無撞親人
隔離個好利害...完全無反應.
作者: getwayhk 時間: 2017-8-8 09:58
男女都有機會撞車, 但你睇下女人撞車既原因同男人比就知道, 女人係冇機械感方向感.
作者: gary1200 時間: 2017-8-8 16:37
男女都有機會發生啦
via HKEPC Ionic Reader v1.7.0 - Android
作者: trendhk 時間: 2017-8-8 19:17
個女司機仲四圍叫人刪左條片,點知搞到依家愈傳愈開

作者: BEpsilon 時間: 2017-8-8 19:43
亦有可能係考到之後好多年都沒有練習駕車的雪藏牌,再加上唔熟該部車。
作者: love19901109 時間: 2017-8-8 20:09
回覆 5# BEpsilon
直頭係出停車場前先渣呢部 唔係入果陣應該撞左
作者: Botti 時間: 2017-8-9 09:02
老實講, 如果雪藏牌
1. 無理由借架牛龜咁大架車玩...
2. 更不理解...咁有信心由停車場開出去 ? 香港 d 停車場窄到呢
PS. 由車位開到閘口之前, hi 左幾多架車

3. 今次試車都幾"溶"....車頭蓋噴返坐底2K幾, 最尾撞個下賠幾多????
作者: PPLd 時間: 2017-8-9 10:01
what car do you drive?
This car:

is longer than this car:

作者: Botti 時間: 2017-8-9 10:19
本帖最後由 Botti 於 2017-8-9 10:30 編輯
which car do you drive then ?一架車轉彎
駕使位位置/高低 + 車軸長短 + 轉向特性, 尤其是後者, 更重要
你不如搵架拖頭比較, 然後話, 點算大牛龜

重有, 唔通你識事主知道佢可駕馭到 corolla ? 所以架 rover 算唔上大牛龜 (對事主)

作者: PPLd 時間: 2017-8-9 11:52
本帖最後由 PPLd 於 2017-8-9 11:55 編輯
which car do you drive then ?
一架車轉彎
駕使位位置/高低 + 車軸長短 + 轉向特性, 尤其是後者, 更重要
你不如搵架拖頭比較, 然後話, 點算大牛龜
重有, 唔通你識事主知道佢可駕馭到 corolla ? 所以架 rover 算唔上大牛龜 (對事主)
Botti 發表於 2017-8-9 10:19
I would answer the question after you.
And, I am not sure if you are trying to make fun or make yourself looking weird.
Luckily I am a very free guy to help special need kids out.
Usually I start my special need kids class by telling them to read from facts and data instead of personal feelings which could cloud judgement.
Corolla:
4529mm L x 1705mm W x 1486mm H + 2600mm WB
Area occupied = 7.72 m2
Evoque:
4371mm L x 1900mm W x 1635mm H + 2660mm WB
Area occupied = 8.30 m2 (7% more area)
Actros:
6113mm L x 2495mm W x 3715mm H + 3600mm WB
Area occupied = 15.25 m2 (97% more area)
My Chinese and Maths are not so good.
Would you explain to forum readers how you define "牛龜咁大架車" so I could learn as well?
I tried to Google, and it says "Cattle turtle car frame". I cant get your drift so my English is poor too.
Is 牛龜咁大 to be any number within 7% to 97%, or any special reference for you to include a tow truck?
Maybe for some people anything with wheels can be compared.
But I heard that you might need a difference licence to drive some machines.
Another thing I teach in class, it is better to compare similar items.
Now I realized that you can compare apple to melon as they seem to be plants, but it might makes the comparison less meaningful.
I might have to add that to my class notes too.
Edit: added "and Maths"
作者: faifai2016 時間: 2017-8-9 12:20
睇見都得人驚,出到街會唔會危及路人安全
作者: qkuser 時間: 2017-8-9 12:26
可能佢以為自己渣緊碰碰車
第一下我當你發白日夢,第二下連慢慢郁都唔識,呢d 應該要重考, ,
作者: fkjohnny 時間: 2017-8-9 12:35
話唔定大陸人呢,個牌買返嚟,再嚟香港cup牌
作者: Rosa 時間: 2017-8-9 12:45
"普遍"女性對"使用重型工具"係差D
人類幾千年歷史,普遍都係男人使用重型工具
例外當然有
有
有!!!
我係車外面幫阿頭睇位調頭
我叫佢R波走,佢就D波撞埋我度
作者: Botti 時間: 2017-8-9 13:04
本帖最後由 Botti 於 2017-8-9 13:10 編輯
When one tries to use nos to define if a car is good handling or not, that is weird enough & for sure you never own a car, no matter how you pretended to be a pro (one can get all kind of spec/dim fm internet)
I hv no interest to argue non-sense for the sake of someone who enjoys arguing . Good luck !!
作者: Botti 時間: 2017-8-9 13:14
回覆 12# qkuser
佢 hi 埋條欄
花第一次
R 波回車
花第二條痕
咁...兩條痕都係噴一次油
但再俾油扭軑撞埋去
就真係好傷
作者: qkuser 時間: 2017-8-9 13:35
回覆 16# Botti
第二下,我諗佢無俾油,佢放break 一下放晒,但隻手又痙鑾走去即刻扭軑

作者: PPLd 時間: 2017-8-9 14:20
When one tries to use nos to define if a car is good handling or not, that is weird enough & for sure you never own a car, no matter how you pretended to be a pro (one can get all kind of spec/dim fm internet)
I hv no interest to argue non-sense for the sake of someone who enjoys arguing . Good luck !!
Botti 發表於 2017-8-9 13:04
I didnt realize 牛龜咁大架車 was talking about GOOD HANDLING or not.
Always thought it is related to size.
Learn something new every day.
Thought I have posted a lot of my cars on this forum.
It doesnt matter what I drive but what is truth.
I can understand how our special need kids have communication difficulties.
Usually I teach mild classes, but sometimes moderate.
You may come join our classes.
Dont worry we dont bite newcomers.
作者: BEpsilon 時間: 2017-8-11 19:49
I believe this is a valid concern.
Even for regular drivers, suddenly switching from a nimble compact sedan to a LWB minivan or pick-up truck may require some time to get used to. Different vehicles have different "feel" and performance characteristics. Size of blind-spots is different too.
This incident has to do with an inexperienced (and perhaps over-confident) driver, IMO.
作者: kf 時間: 2017-8-11 23:09
新手到呢~無教車師傳傍住,係咁上下喇
哦~條bar 唔係自動開
倒車約17秒時,人望右,手扭右

嘟完飛,開閘,比油開車~撞
(有D嘢冇留意喎,之前扭右軚)作者: kf 時間: 2017-8-11 23:24
成件事,係車廠嘅錯,以為加D乜科技就可以吸納一班唔識揸車有錢人
乜架車唔係有sensor感車前面有死物會急煞車
偏移提示,自動泊車...............................................
作者: waione 時間: 2017-8-19 19:31
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: newdaylow 時間: 2017-8-20 15:48
係吾係 2手車交收後從車場揸走?
作者: secretman 時間: 2017-8-21 21:36
個乘客對架車好有信心

