作者: ahshing 時間: 2008-10-31 12:32 標題: a700高ISO小秘技
我諗咁樣既質素，唔好話縮圖擺上網，直出曬大相都應該冇乜問題
Click小圖可看大圖
a700 v4,Helios 44M-4
ISO3200
ISO6400
放大圖時，記得留意HI-C個C字下面既水珠...
秘技就係...
ISO NR:High
DR+
Creative style: Standard,Saturation+1,Sharpness+1,Brightness-2,Zone-1
另外最好用返Standard同Neutral既Creative style，sharpness既調整都會影響到noise明唔明顯，用+1就o岩o岩好
作者: 蔥頭 時間: 2008-10-31 12:34
原帖由 ahshing 於 2008-10-31 12:32 發表
我諗咁樣既質素，唔好話縮圖擺上網，直出曬大相都應該冇乜問題
Click小圖可看大圖
a700 v4,Helios 44M-4
ISO3200
ISO6400
http://i342.photobucket.c ...
唔該晒作者: rickywk 時間: 2008-10-31 12:43
幾時先有a350秘技
作者: zeroken 時間: 2008-10-31 13:09
.強丫...
作者: poyin 時間: 2008-10-31 13:37
原帖由 rickywk 於 2008-10-31 12:43 發表
幾時先有a350秘技
我都等緊.....
作者: Yoda 時間: 2008-10-31 14:20
The details are all gone in ISO6400.
ISO3200 is still acceptable.
作者: initials 時間: 2008-10-31 14:29
noise is removed as well as the detail...
can obviously see NR is done on it...
one more thing... if the photo is bright, the noise is not that obvious...
please try to shoot something at night and try again. Thanks!
[ 本帖最後由 initials 於 2008-10-31 14:41 編輯 ]
作者: ahshing 時間: 2008-10-31 14:41
原帖由 Yoda 於 2008-10-31 14:20 發表
The details are all gone in ISO6400.
ISO3200 is still acceptable.
我比較懶,如果唔係,機身NR off,然後放落電腦noise ninja一下,效果一樣好
原文出處
http://forums.dpreview.com/forum ... amp;thread=29698285
http://forums.dpreview.com/forum ... amp;thread=29810219
我諗a700咁既質素,同D300,50D比,已經相當稱職
http://forums.dpreview.com/forum ... mp;message=29725833
唔講咁遠,就用D300黎比,所謂detail lost,係事實?還是偏見?
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d90/iso-3200.htm
http://www.dchome.net/viewthread.php?tid=550613
http://www.dchome.net/viewthread.php?tid=569337
[ 本帖最後由 ahshing 於 2008-10-31 14:58 編輯 ]
作者: ahshing 時間: 2008-10-31 14:52
原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-31 14:29 發表
noise is removed as well as the detail...
can obviously see NR is done on it...
one more thing... if the photo is bright, the noise is not that obvious...
please try to shoot something at night and tr ...
我呢度既現場環鏡一d都唔光,只係我加左曝光補償
低光攝影,都唔係完全冇光源走去影丫
黑媽媽光線唔靚既相,俾我覺得唔影也擺
如果你話低光試鏡+聞相,我係有做過,不過我覺得平時冇咁既必要咯...
a700 v4 / sigma 15-30 / 手持 / 防手震 on / 12mp xfine jpg / 原相resize後直出
除#2指明nr off外，其他都係nr low
如果用raw轉jpg相信質素更高
#1
100%CROP
#2 (呢張突登nr off，等大家睇清楚星光行banner既error box)
100%CROP
#3文化中心牆身既瓦片睇得清清楚楚
100%CROP
#4
100%CROP
#5
100%CROP
#6
100%CROP
#7
100%CROP
作者: initials 時間: 2008-10-31 14:56
i was talking about the area of low light in the picture would show the noise more obviously
what i mean is that if you shoot one with lower ev value... to retain the mood of darkness, say, in a pub, i don't think you shoot so bright, right?... you will see how horrible the noise is... i am not just talking about sony/km but also other system...
noise is more obvious in low light part...
[ 本帖最後由 initials 於 2008-10-31 14:58 編輯 ]
作者: ahshing 時間: 2008-10-31 15:10
原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-31 14:56 發表
i was talking about the area of low light in the picture would show the noise more obviously
what i mean is that if you shoot one with lower ev value... to retain the mood of darkness, say, in a pub, ...
咁又唔係咁多人需要晌pub落面影相既...
我search dchome入面既d300高iso,全部都係日光下打雀tim...
作者: initials 時間: 2008-10-31 15:16
原帖由 ahshing 於 2008-10-31 15:10 發表
咁又唔係咁多人需要晌pub落面影相既...
我search dchome入面既d300高iso,全部都係日光下打雀tim...
yup, it depends on photography style...
作者: rickywk 時間: 2008-10-31 15:21
原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-31 15:16 發表
yup, it depends on photography style...
呢間cafe係唔係o係元朗?
作者: ahshing 時間: 2008-10-31 15:22
原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-31 15:16 發表
yup, it depends on photography style...
http://farm4.static.flickr.com ...
我冇乜夜生活...人地有...
不過要睇又要login acc wor
http://www.hkmug.org/viewthread.php?tid=18108
作者: initials 時間: 2008-10-31 15:27
原帖由 rickywk 於 2008-10-31 15:21 發表
呢間cafe係唔係o係元朗?
作者: initials 時間: 2008-10-31 15:29
原帖由 ahshing 於 2008-10-31 15:22 發表
我冇乜夜生活...人地有...
不過要睇又要login acc wor
http://www.hkmug.org/viewthread.php?tid=18108
haha, life style also affects photography...
also, i don't have much chance to travel around...
i take relatively less landscape..
作者: rickywk 時間: 2008-10-31 15:30
原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-31 15:27 發表
好掛住佢o的甜品
作者: ahshing 時間: 2008-10-31 15:37
原帖由 initials 於 2008-10-31 15:29 發表
haha, life style also affects photography...
also, i don't have much chance to travel around...
i take relatively less landscape..
尋晚都俾我女朋友點醒左，其實香港都有好多靚景影到相
唔一定出面果d先係好，而且我相對地鍾意影小品，題材隨處都是...
作者: licgfg 時間: 2008-10-31 15:39
其實setting要點試?
每一樣郁下撞下咁?
作者: ahshing 時間: 2008-10-31 15:47
原帖由 licgfg 於 2008-10-31 15:39 發表
其實setting要點試?
每一樣郁下撞下咁?
最好睇睇呢度我覆左既原文出處:
http://www.hkepc.com/forum/viewt ... ;page=1#pid17358499
重點係，盡量利用zone-1同brightness-1去降低機身post processess對noise既影響
作者: initials 時間: 2008-10-31 16:04
原帖由 licgfg 於 2008-10-31 15:39 發表
其實setting要點試?
每一樣郁下撞下咁?
you shoot raw, change the parameter and see the difference
作者: Yoda 時間: 2008-10-31 18:07
Noise Ninja probably does a better job than most in camera NR. The thing is when NR is high the lost of details will be more. It happens with all cameras, although some performs better than others. If it works at ISO 3200 it is already very good.
Also, initials is right. Noise will be more obvious in dark and underexposed areas. Properly exposed area will have less noise. I explained that in another post earlier.
Bird photos usually have more noise because a lot of birders apply a high dose of USM to give more apparent sharpness to the feather. They do not care too much for noise.
作者: AMD波子 時間: 2008-11-1 12:46
原帖由 ahshing 於 2008-10-31 15:37 發表
尋晚都俾我女朋友點醒左，其實香港都有好多靚景影到相
唔一定出面果d先係好，而且我相對地鍾意影小品，題材隨處都是...
其實香港真係好多好靚既地方，不過都好大煙(smog)...
作者: s84292 時間: 2008-11-3 15:19
噗...D300跟A700是同一塊CMOS...如果比D300差很多,那SONY就不用再做DSLR市場, 那塊CMOS是他自家產品... NIKON還可以外加14BIT RAW