作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-13 11:30 標題: 《現代戰爭2》初步細節
據看過即將面市的六月號《GameInformer》雜誌的GameSpot編輯稱，《現代戰爭2》的年代背景設定在原作劇情塵埃落定數年後。在不久的將來，俄羅斯內部政局不穩（當然是虛構的）再次對世界和平構成了威脅——就像三月發佈的莫名預告片所暗示的那樣，一個恐怖組織初露端倪。
CoD4中的一位英雄人物，綽號“Soap”的MacTavish軍士在新作中已被提升為上尉，繼續為英國特別空勤團（SAS）效力，其合作單位是美海軍海豹突擊隊（SEALs）。MacTavish將帶領玩家經歷一系列奔襲行動，包括在俄羅斯茫茫雪原上滲透俄軍基地。
在遊戲設計上，《現代戰爭2》將致力於解決敵軍無限重生的頑疾——該系列最令人詬病之處；但指望單機劇情能在原作6-10小時的基礎上有所拓展的玩 家可能會有些失望，“進一步延伸劇情不像是個正確的選擇”，Infinity Ward總裁兼首席運營官Jason West對《GameInformer》雜誌表示說。
另有人指，儘管如此，《現代戰爭2》的單機劇情仍比《CoD4》要長（待證實）；雖仍沿用線性關卡設計，但遊戲環境更為開放；遊戲幀率可保持在每秒60幀的水準上，且畫面細節更豐富（對主機而言；PC版的畫面到頂也就是那樣）。
《現代戰爭2》將具備引以為傲的“特種部隊”新模式，類似於原作中解開的“Mile High Club”突襲機艙救出人質的挑戰關卡；但期盼度很高的合作通關模式也許這次依然欠奉，“我們之前按自己的喜好做了一大堆合作通關的內容，可惜與劇情沒法 契合”，Jason West解釋說。
該作的進一步細節刊登在六月號的《GameInformer》雜誌上：
首批洩露的雜誌掃圖：
作者: Van仔 時間: 2009-5-13 14:35
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: Amuro0079 時間: 2009-5-13 15:19
If they really got rid of the infinite spawn scripted gameplay, I may pick it up, otherwise ArmA 2 here I come.
作者: pklau 時間: 2009-5-13 15:35
cod4 上網玩好混亂
轉黎轉去
唔知現代戰爭2會唔會咁
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-13 15:47
原帖由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-13 15:19 發表
If they really got rid of the infinite spawn scripted gameplay, I may pick it up, otherwise ArmA 2 here I come.
in my mind, i expect OPF:DR more than AMRAII
作者: Amuro0079 時間: 2009-5-13 16:03
I'll be getting both though. OFP:DR is delayed till Fall 2009. ArmAII will be out next month. But for me, OFP will be snacks, while ArmA 2 will be the entree. BTW, why would you expect OPF:DR more? I mean Codemasters has no track record in FPS development. And there aren't pilotable fixed-wing aircrafts in DR, but ArmA 2 have them. You know how much I love flying, lol...
Oh, have you watched the TrackIR 5 premiere video with ArmA 2 on youtube? It's amazing. I bought TrackIR 5 last week, and can't wait to use it on ArmA 2. Anyway, watch it if you haven't:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wXx3vMy_AQ&fmt=22
P.S. If you know anyone interested in a 99% new TrackIR 4 Pro, lemme know. :)
[ 本帖最後由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-13 16:10 編輯 ]
作者: gooGI 時間: 2009-5-13 16:29
no more captain price in cod6
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-13 20:29
原帖由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-13 16:03 發表
I'll be getting both though. OFP:DR is delayed till Fall 2009. ArmAII will be out next month. But for me, OFP will be snacks, while ArmA 2 will be the entree. BTW, why would you expect OPF:DR m ...
The feel of War, the blood of OPF, and Warfare simulation, AI Simulation, Weapon Simulation, check on those compare post in SAM Forum or other OFR, ARMA forum.
作者: cryks 時間: 2009-5-13 23:14
好想見到不停有seals 俾人射死又不停 respawn 既情景
一定好頂癮
作者: powerking 時間: 2009-5-14 00:08
期待
如果有合作模式就好喇
作者: shodanng 時間: 2009-5-14 00:35
有盾牌用
咪好似Rainbow Six咁
[ 本帖最後由 shodanng 於 2009-5-14 00:35 編輯 ]
作者: Amuro0079 時間: 2009-5-14 10:30
原帖由 CWHS 於 2009-5-13 20:29 發表
The feel of War, the blood of OPF, and Warfare simulation, AI Simulation, Weapon Simulation, check on those compare post in SAM Forum or other OFR, ARMA forum.
Sorry for doubting you, but I seriously don't know what you're talking about. I've been following both ArmA 2 and OFP very closely in the past 12 months, and I've been active on both official forums. Based on what I see, (BTW, Arma 2 so far has a lot more information out there out there than OFP does) all of the information, screenshots, in-game videos (tons of them) is suggesting that Arma 2 will be a much better military sim than OFP, much better weapon/vehicle simulation, realistic bulletics, micro-AI. Codemasters claims that OFP will have better AI, but so far they have not released any concrete proof that it does.
[ 本帖最後由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 10:31 編輯 ]
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-14 10:36
原帖由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 10:30 發表
Sorry for doubting you, but I seriously don't know what you're talking about. I've been following both ArmA 2 and OFP very closely in the past 12 months, and I've been active on both official forum ...
Okay, for a simple example, you know what is holographic, and how does Eotech Works. Then check the video in real world and compare to OFP:DR, ARMA (Mod) and ARMR II.
also the ACOG...etc...
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-14 10:49
原帖由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 10:30 發表
Sorry for doubting you, but I seriously don't know what you're talking about. I've been following both ArmA 2 and OFP very closely in the past 12 months, and I've been active on both official forum ...
http://bbs.samren.cn/read.php?tid=9170
Some of'em said some good point.
and additional
1. On Physic, base on a DiRT engine, i don't think the improved "eGO" engine will worse than orginal DiRT.
2. In AI, the video i can say for Arma II, a delay Robot(not a human), rely on heavily script to improve, however OFP:DR AI is
AI's ability to react accordingly to different engagementsituations. However, a strategically successful approach will alwayswin the day.
The Dev team said that from the first day, it is react like a human.
作者: Amuro0079 時間: 2009-5-14 11:07
原帖由 CWHS 於 2009-5-14 10:36 發表
Okay, for a simple example, you know what is holographic, and how does Eotech Works. Then check the video in real world and compare to OFP:DR, ARMA (Mod) and ARMR II.
also the ACOG...etc...
I watched it before. The Eotech video doesn't impress me at all.
作者: Amuro0079 時間: 2009-5-14 11:12
原帖由 CWHS 於 2009-5-14 10:49 發表
http://bbs.samren.cn/read.php?tid=9170
Some of'em said some good point.
and additional
1. On Physic, base on a DiRT engine, i don't think the improved "eGO" engine will worse than orginal DiRT.
2. In ...
Like I said, the OFP:DR devs said that but so far I have not seen any proof. It's all just talk. As for the ArmA 2 robot AI you mentioned, you do know that video is not based on the final build right? If you believe what CM says about their AI, why can't you do the same for BIS on their Micro-AI?
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-14 11:15
原帖由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 11:07 發表
I watched it before. The Eotech video doesn't impress me at all.
Not need to impress, just it's not working, especially if u tried the real thing, will know how it useful in real life.
For a aimpoint, how come a 2MOA dot can such large.
That is Weapon Simulation, and ARMA II failure to did it again.
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-14 11:16
原帖由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 11:12 發表
Like I said, the OFP:DR devs said that but so far I have not seen any proof. It's all just talk. As for the ArmA 2 robot AI you mentioned, you do know that video is not based on the final build rig ...
Okay, will see.
作者: Amuro0079 時間: 2009-5-14 11:19
BTW, I checked the SAM forum link you posted, and I totally agree with post#3 by Godspeed:
"我也看不出来什么~ "
作者: Amuro0079 時間: 2009-5-14 11:20
原帖由 CWHS 於 2009-5-14 11:15 發表
Not need to impress, just it's not working, especially if u tried the real thing, will know how it useful in real life.
For a aimpoint, how come a 2MOA dot can such large.
That is Weapon Simulation, ...
What 2MOA dot? What are you talking about? Please post a shot or something of the aimpoints than we can talk about it.
[ 本帖最後由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 11:23 編輯 ]
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-14 11:24
原帖由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 11:20 發表
What 2MOA dot? What are you talking about?
...Weapon Simulation Details...
For a Aimpoint, in game is COMP-M2, it's MOA is 2, 2MOA.
For a Eotech, outer circle 65MOA with 1 MOA dot.
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-14 11:25
原帖由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 11:20 發表
What 2MOA dot? What are you talking about? Please post a shot or something of the aimpoints than we can talk about it.
correction
2MOA
4MOA
[ 本帖最後由 CWHS 於 2009-5-14 11:27 編輯 ]
作者: Amuro0079 時間: 2009-5-14 11:53
So you're complaining about the dot being too large in ArmA2? And you do that base on what? A video, screenshot? And because of that you think OFP has better weapon sim? I don't know about OFP, but in ArmA 2 every moving part of a weapon is simulated.
BTW, have you seen the first EGO gameplay video CM released 2 months ago? Remeber the way the gun attached to the viewpiont/hud, turning at the same speed as you turn your head, that is very unrealistic. Also, the AI in that video is terrible.
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-14 12:02
原帖由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 11:53 發表
So you're complaining about the dot being too large in ArmA2? And you do that base on what? A video, screenshot? And because of that you think OFP has better weapon sim? I don't know about OFP, bu ...
no, my complain is weapon simulation.
viewpiont/hud??? what's it? Eotech?
turning at the same speed as you turn your head???
i'm hardly to get that?
If u say the dot didn't change, that is correct because the dot always in center.
If u talking the optic and the head moving at same speed, that is correct, because in real case, even not in aiming position, line of sight always sync on weapon, at least i did, the U.S Army did.
作者: Amuro0079 時間: 2009-5-14 12:26
原帖由 CWHS 於 2009-5-14 12:02 發表
no, my complain is weapon simulation.
viewpiont/hud??? what's it? Eotech?
turning at the same speed as you turn your head???
i'm hardly to get that?
If u say the dot didn't change, that is correct be ...
No, I'm talking about the crosshair or hud of the gun being attached to your head always, meaning it turns with your head even when you're not holding the gun in aming position, as if you always turns your full body with the gun pointing at the middle, but in fact you should be only turning your head. Both OPF1 and ArmA have done that right.
And to be honest, there shouldn't even be a hud or crosshair in a simulation game like this. ArmA, Arma2, or OFP 1 don't have them.
As for your complaint of weapon sim, I think you're just neatpicking. Remeber you're staring at pixels on a computer display, if they made the Eotech dot any smaller, it could become a problem, or if it's really a mistake, the devs will fix it, as it's not hard to shrink the dot.
[ 本帖最後由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 12:37 編輯 ]
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-14 12:38
原帖由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 12:26 發表
No, I'm talking about the crosshair or hud of the gun being attached to your head always, meaning it turns with your head even when you're not holding the gun in aming position, as if you always turn ...
...learn what is MOA, that wasn't neat picking...
As everyone know, HUD and crosshair can switchoff many game.
"the crosshair or hud of the gun being attached to your head always"
It's teach by the Army manual on how to use a M-16 - Basic.
I know what that is u talking now, but it's quite useless if u a sharpshooter, and a right solider, it only happen on machine gun supporter.
And while that movement the weapon sight should not be static, but Arma/ Arma II did static...
作者: Amuro0079 時間: 2009-5-14 12:47
You don't know what I'm talking about. I'm talking about moving your head with the gun pointing forward, cause sometimes you just want to move your head quickly and see what's around you then back. I'm not the only one complaining about that. Go to the official forum and search EGO video and you know what I'm talking about.
[ 本帖最後由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 12:50 編輯 ]
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-14 12:49
原帖由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 12:47 發表
You don't know what I'm talking about. I'm talking about moving your head with the gun pointing forward, cause sometimes you just want to move your head quickly and see what's around you then back. ...
...TrackIR SDK...right?
作者: Amuro0079 時間: 2009-5-14 12:55
原帖由 CWHS 於 2009-5-14 12:49 發表
...TrackIR SDK...right?
Yeah, but OFPDR don't support TrackIR. Anyways, only arcade shooters would have the gun permanently fixed at one position when you run and turn, in more realistic shooters, there should be a delay, unless you're aiming down sight.
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-14 12:59
原帖由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 12:55 發表
Yeah, but OFPDR don't support TrackIR. Anyways, only arcade shooters would have the gun permanently fixed at one position when you run and turn, in more realistic shooters, there should be a delay, ...
Okay, by 95%+ of peoples without TrackIR, i think it's for reduce cost to dev(maybe also don't wanna delay again)
Yep, i accept, that was a bad point for OFP:DR
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-14 13:01
原帖由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 12:55 發表
Yeah, but OFPDR don't support TrackIR. Anyways, only arcade shooters would have the gun permanently fixed at one position when you run and turn, in more realistic shooters, there should be a delay, ...
additional for your final word.
a Well-Train solider can easy did that. I did it.
作者: Amuro0079 時間: 2009-5-14 13:30
No, they don't support TrackIR because they want all versions to be the same. They don't want the PC version to be different.
And there's a difference between can do it and would do it, trained or not.
BTW, I'm going to bring up the MOA issue at the BIS forums. Mind if I use your images?
Edit
Just need to get it right, the 2 MOA dot in ArmA2 looks like a 4 MOA dot, is that what you were saying?
[ 本帖最後由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 13:34 編輯 ]
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-14 13:47
原帖由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 13:30 發表
No, they don't support TrackIR because they want all versions to be the same. They don't want the PC version to be different.
And there's a difference between can do it and would do it, trained or ...
But arma2 also available in console..
and the arma dot.
作者: Amuro0079 時間: 2009-5-14 13:53
原帖由 CWHS 於 2009-5-14 13:47 發表
But arma2 also available in console..
and the arma dot.
ArmA 2 consoles are not confirmed, only planned for 360, but don't know when it will come out.
About that image you posted, is the blue circle ArmA 2 or Arma, that is really big
[ 本帖最後由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 13:57 編輯 ]
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-14 14:00
原帖由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-14 13:53 發表
ArmA 2 consoles are not confirmed, only planned for 360, but don't know when it will come out.
About that image you posted, is the blue circle ArmA 2 or Arma, that is really big
i just forgot and can't found any pic in google.
作者: shingfd 時間: 2009-5-14 22:43
i can only say you 2 have successfully hijacked the post to your arma/ofp versus
作者: cryks 時間: 2009-5-15 00:45
"真實"的戰爭遊戲體驗
作者: ps3good 時間: 2009-5-15 06:43
做乜全部英文post.
作者: HKZonda 時間: 2009-5-15 06:52
原帖由 ps3good 於 2009-5-15 06:43 發表
做乜全部英文post.
You got a problem with that?
作者: gooGI 時間: 2009-5-15 07:00
原帖由 shingfd 於 2009-5-14 22:43 發表
i can only say you 2 have successfully hijacked the post to your arma/ofp versus
so sad... it seems no one cares about captain price
作者: dom 時間: 2009-5-15 10:39
Gees guys , open a new post and argue about it
This post is above Modern Warfare 2
not American Army / Operation FlashPoint argue post
作者: dom 時間: 2009-5-15 10:40
原帖由 CWHS 於 13-5-2009 11:30 AM 發表
據看過即將面市的六月號《GameInformer》雜誌的GameSpot編輯稱，《現代戰爭2》的年代背景設定在原作劇情塵埃落定數年後。在不久的將來，俄羅斯內部政局不穩（當然是虛構的）再次對世界和平構成了威脅——就像三月發佈的莫名 ...
Captain Price
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-15 10:45
原帖由 gooGI 於 2009-5-15 07:00 發表
so sad... it seems no one cares about captain price
I got a feeling price will appear very surprisingly
作者: cryks 時間: 2009-5-15 11:31
cod1 Captain Price 死過一次
cod4 又咪出現
可能Price 響製作人腦入面唔係一個人
而係一個大家族
D人個樣仲要一模一樣
死極都仲可以好似佢個戰鬥系統咁不停 respawn
作者: gooGI 時間: 2009-5-15 14:19
原帖由 C.Repairer 於 2009-5-15 11:31 發表
cod1 Captain Price 死過一次
cod4 又咪出現
可能Price 響製作人腦入面唔係一個人
而係一個大家族
D人個樣仲要一模一樣
死極都仲可以好似佢個戰鬥系統咁不停 respawn
曾祖父打一戰
呀爺打二戰
呀爸打越戰
仔打伊戰
作者: dvitbilly 時間: 2009-5-15 23:42
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: hanghanghang 時間: 2009-5-15 23:51
原帖由 dvitbilly 於 2009-5-15 23:42 發表
good game
o係交易區俾人扣晒d分就黎灌水
唔好以為無人知
報告左喇
http://www.hkepc.com/forum/viewt ... page%3D1&page=3
http://www.hkepc.com/forum/viewt ... page%3D1&page=7
http://www.hkepc.com/forum/viewt ... page%3D1&page=9
作者: Nabore 時間: 2009-5-18 19:50
原帖由 pklau 於 2009-5-13 15:35 發表
cod4 上網玩好混亂
轉黎轉去
唔知現代戰爭2會唔會咁
冇人叫你一定要玩TDM....
作者: 小白豬 時間: 2009-5-18 22:40
期待呀真係
作者: sayume 時間: 2009-5-22 10:50
希望d槍械設定做好d啦
佢二戰d槍就整到好正
現代槍就
作者: RCHK 時間: 2009-5-22 15:31
Exclusive Gameplay Teaser HD
http://www.gametrailers.com/vide ... odern-warfare/49544
作者: RCHK 時間: 2009-5-25 11:59
Modern Warfare 2
Official website updated
http://modernwarfare2.infinityward.com/
作者: 小白豬 時間: 2009-5-25 12:48
原帖由 RCHK 於 2009-5-25 11:59 發表
Modern Warfare 2
Official website updated
http://modernwarfare2.infinityward.com/
嘩
故事模式好吸引
作者: shodanng 時間: 2009-5-25 13:45
原帖由 RCHK 於 2009-5-22 15:31 發表
Exclusive Gameplay Teaser HD
http://www.gametrailers.com/vide ... odern-warfare/49544
睇Gameplay畫面氣氛不下COD4
作者: qazwsxedcrfv000 時間: 2009-5-25 13:48
似唔似''石破天驚''入面某一幕
[ 本帖最後由 qazwsxedcrfv000 於 2009-5-25 13:48 編輯 ]
作者: sayume 時間: 2009-5-25 14:04
要成10月先有得玩??
作者: Amuro0079 時間: 2009-5-25 14:31
The real good news:
Modern Warfare 2 eliminating respawning enemies
http://www.destructoid.com/moder ... nemies-132708.phtml
"Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare is one of my favorite shooters, but its single-player campaign did have a few issues, most notable among them being the respawning enemies that would only cease after players crossed an invisible line. I've never understood why this has ever been considered a good design choice, but it seems that, fortunately, Infinity Ward has finally got the message.
"We are aware of it and we're actively trying to eliminate it," states Infinity Ward president and CCO Jason West. "I think we agree that it's not very good."
West's confession comes courtesy of the latest Game Informer, where Modern Warfare 2 had a big intel blowout. Other tidbits of info include the fact that players will be taking orders from Captain "Soap" MacTavish, the silent player character from the original Modern Warfare, while tracking down a Russian madman known as Makarov.
Infinity Ward is still keeping a lid on multiplayer details, although we do know that a co-op mode, Special Forces, will be available, and that the developer is looking at ways to make notable online players "famous" for their in-game accomplishments. Sounds interesting, but right now we have no idea what they mean.
Still, great news on that respawning stuff. Now, if only we can just stop the AI from grenade-spamming all the time."
[ 本帖最後由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-25 14:35 編輯 ]
作者: shingfd 時間: 2009-5-25 15:21
well i think without the respawning the nade spam might just be solved also
[ 本帖最後由 shingfd 於 2009-5-25 15:21 編輯 ]
作者: Scuderia 時間: 2009-5-25 15:22
原帖由 RCHK 於 2009-5-25 11:59 發表
Modern Warfare 2
Official website updated
http://modernwarfare2.infinityward.com/
what a nice game
作者: Scuderia 時間: 2009-5-25 15:23
原帖由 RCHK 於 2009-5-25 11:59 發表
Modern Warfare 2
Official website updated
http://modernwarfare2.infinityward.com/
what a nice game
作者: HKMichaelKing 時間: 2009-5-25 16:28
型
[ 本帖最後由 HKMichaelKing 於 2009-5-25 16:38 編輯 ]
作者: kevincswong1994 時間: 2009-5-25 17:44
1弟30果下正
作者: 小魔皇 時間: 2009-5-25 22:02
del
[ 本帖最後由 小魔皇 於 2009-5-25 22:02 編輯 ]
作者: ctbear 時間: 2009-5-25 22:37
原帖由 sayume 於 2009-5-25 14:04 發表
要成10月先有得玩??
11月10日
作者: Scuderia 時間: 2009-5-25 23:00
maybe have demo
作者: 田中‧莫杉 時間: 2009-5-26 01:34
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-26 09:20
原帖由 田中‧莫杉 於 2009-5-26 01:34 發表
點解好似越來越似GRAW風格
GRAW -> Future Combat
MW / MW2 -> Modern Combat
作者: akyp 時間: 2009-5-26 13:25
The respawning in CoD4 is silly in that you can just rush forward and people on your side will kill most enemies for you.
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-26 13:30
原帖由 akyp 於 2009-5-26 13:25 發表
The respawning in CoD4 is silly in that you can just rush forward and people on your side will kill most enemies for you.
Oh really? i played in hardend 90%+ of the enemies killed by me.
作者: Amuro0079 時間: 2009-5-26 14:24
原帖由 akyp 於 2009-5-26 13:25 發表
The respawning in CoD4 is silly in that you can just rush forward and people on your side will kill most enemies for you.
Sometimes, you don't even have to kill, just keep dodging and run cross the line, and the spawn stops.
[ 本帖最後由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-26 14:24 編輯 ]
作者: rocketdive04 時間: 2009-5-26 15:47
原帖由 akyp 於 2009-5-26 13:25 發表
The respawning in CoD4 is silly in that you can just rush forward and people on your side will kill most enemies for you.
sometimes the guys on the server set the respawing time to longer, to avoid someone rush and kill
作者: cryks 時間: 2009-5-27 00:08
原帖由 Amuro0079 於 2009-5-26 14:24 發表
Sometimes, you don't even have to kill, just keep dodging and run cross the line, and the spawn stops.
X2
作者: cryks 時間: 2009-5-27 00:09
原帖由 rocketdive04 於 2009-5-26 15:47 發表
sometimes the guys on the server set the respawing time to longer, to avoid someone rush and kill
talking solo play...
作者: CWHS 時間: 2009-5-27 00:31
actually when i heard the voice of the trailer, i gotta miss Gaz and Price voice, i think it's the soul of the loading vid in COD4.
作者: EXiV2000GT 時間: 2009-5-29 21:41
正野@@"
好期待
作者: 艾朗藍斯 時間: 2009-6-1 12:59
呢隻game一定要玩
作者: qqq999 時間: 2009-6-2 16:57
http://gnn.gamer.com.tw/9/37119.html
E3 09: Fullscreen Gameplay Demo (Cam)
唔知有冇人貼過
作者: abrt65478 時間: 2009-6-2 17:00
點解集集都有captain.price但係今集無架
作者: Amuro0079 時間: 2009-6-2 17:04
原帖由 abrt65478 於 2009-6-2 17:00 發表
點解集集都有captain.price但係今集無架
可能喪屍mode(如果有的話)有佢...
作者: ching8509 時間: 2009-6-2 17:17
唔錯咁ｗｏ，大約幾時出？？？